Researchers with potential conflicts of interest and opposed reviewers are filtered out the remaining candidates are then ranked using specific criteria e.g. The Reviewer Recommender generates reviewer recommendations based on AI technology and allows you to easily identify and evaluate review candidates. Making optimal use of the journal’s reviewer databaseġ) How to harness the power of the Reviewer Recommender.
This first article will focus on helping you find and invite suitable reviewers and is divided into three sections: This is the first of a series of Editorial Manager “tips & tricks” articles aiming to make the review process easier and quicker for you. However, not all editors may be aware of the large variety of options that Editorial Manager (EM) offers to support editors to identify and evaluate, invite, retain and reward peer reviewers. Stay tuned for further instalments!Īsk any editor about their main struggle and chances are big they’ll mention finding reviewers. These guide articles are paired with a series of short “how to” videos for maximum ease-of-use. This is the first in a new series of longer, guide-style articles which are intended to give editors some practical insights into how to get the best out of the EM submission system.
0 kommentar(er)
